World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[risk_it_us]

LOL, you've done little more than repeat yourself frank. But I will address these in regards to Globetel's situation.

"That what you see on the surface of Globetel "may" not be what really is there."

That's a perception that many here use to have faith in a company that's never produced any profit, failed at every single venture, contract, project they've ever had, been delisted, sued, investigated, doesn't pay their bills.....on and on and on. You're correct in the fact that Globetel's IR dessiminates info to make them appear on the surface differently then they are in reality. Example...the fluff they constantly release yet fail to inform the investors of numerous contract indebtedness lawsuits against them or at least address them, a refusal to publicly discuss the palmdale eviction....etc. What I see on the surface after digging into globetel is exactly what I've been saying it is. There's no "may" about it.

"Keep in mind I said we let our prejudices, assumptions and ego cause us to come to conclusions which on the surface seem sound and correct but in reality are flawed" Well, ok frank.....my assumptions on globetel whether or not tempered or aggravated by prejudices and/or ego have always ended up right, it may take longer than some of my predictions based upon those assumptions but they are right none the less. Even those who have for years "kept the faith" here will admit that to you so your above statement while right in a sense is a moot point to me.

"First for starters you seem to think I have some argument with the occupation of your friend I don't, and I could care less here's what I said, it's agreeing with you.

"I made an assumption based on the information I chose to pay attention to that your friend was a chicken farmer, which in reality you knew was false because you had information that I either did not have or chose to ignore."

The above statement by you and use of "chicken farmer" was little more than a juvenile attempt to provoke an aggressive response from me. I'll be the first to admit because of my long time occupation it works at times LOL.

"Then you say "What your entire statement proves is that you are an inattentive individual and hear only what you want to hear."

Are you sure I'm the one?"

Yes I'm sure you're the one.

Serious1 is a female, ok I'll take that one as you say. Funny you didn't dispute the fact that she did say it was TelMex as that admission has been mysteriously deleted from this board but it doesn't change the fact that it is telmex. You have NO information that can dispute that as it is a FACT and I know it is fact. Not that that matters, all the hotels in pachuca that actually have wireless internet have had it before NoMas was conceived on paper. Does NoMas operate now in hotels that didn't have wireless before ? I don't know, the issue was Serious's hotel not any other.

"As far as Khoury in the US, it is always good to hedge your bet with ""As far as how I know" lacking any subtsantial proof offered on your part other than you have a source, so do I I'll believe the one I have. BTW you do know Ft Lauderdale is basically Miami don't you? Canada, well he was messing with you but you couldn't see that because of the fore mentioned reasons." I suppose there's no sense in arguing with you here as again you're not questioning mides lack or proof or source and you'd rather believe him (and I can't blame you there actually )so it's moot as well. "As far as I know" Globetel is fixing to go belly up. "As far as I know" Globetel has been evicted from the Palmdale hanger. ......... I'll be sure to keep that phrase in mind in the future.