News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: chebese post# 4350

Thursday, 06/21/2007 4:29:29 PM

Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:29:29 PM

Post# of 12660
>The Phase 3 trial is the `offspring' of the `successful' Phase 2 trial so I would think the probability of success of the phase 3 should be better than the a-priori average.<

Underlying efficacy and probability of success in a given trial are two separate things. The latter obviously depends on the former but it also depends on the trial design.

Program-survival bias refers only to the underlying efficacy per se—not to the clinical-trial design. To reiterate: the efficacy observed in phase-2 programs that end up advancing to phase-3 is biased on the high side relative to the true efficacy of the drugs in question. This bias is either underestimated or not understood by many biotech investors.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today