I don't know Paul's strategy. I assume the New York case was to move it to a friendly court. Paul is not a party to the case. He had an attorney appear as the company. Netco Investments submitted a document asking the Court to allow the attorney to withdraw. Attached to it was a letter from Paul saying, "You are fired" and that he had no obection to judgment. The summary judgment was based on the estoppel of the PA action. What the strategy was, I don't know.
I am not a party to the New York case. I filed a motion to intervene which Madison and the Intervenors opposed. If I am allowed intervention, I could join Paul Taylor as a defendant.
However, I recently joined the bankruptcy action for my unpaid salary. That action is in Texas. In that case, a lawsuit can be filed against Paul Taylor if I choose to pursue that route.
The company is a Texas company and it should be litigated there.
You asked previously why the judgment was filed in PA, not Texas (the cognovit note). It was filed in both PA and Texas. There is a Texas judgment.
