News Focus
News Focus
Followers 277
Posts 12043
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 02/09/2003

Re: Sentinel post# 56874

Friday, 01/02/2004 1:06:41 PM

Friday, January 02, 2004 1:06:41 PM

Post# of 93862
What "new developments" were announced that were significant enough to justify a webcast only two weeks after the ASM? There was nothing solid at all and no PR. Was anything they discussed something that they didn't know about 2 weeks earlier?

IMO, they made a decision not to discuss the S-3 at the ASM and to use a webcast that would increase the share price in anticipation of some major announcement. That would give the price a higher base when the S-3 was filed.

~Cassandra



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today