Yes, but if you think there was no valuable short-, mid- and long-term information conveyed, we certainly have fundamental differences of opinion. The S-3 is a sidenote IMO, a necessary evil, and, as I understand it, the amount of shares was determined by a "worst case scenario" which may not even come about. The webcast had far more worth than what you imply IMO.
Who is this Time Being, and why are we always doing things for it?