DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Sciguy,

Actually, there were two basic methods. Care to name them?

So you don't understand the process, or did you not understand the question?

Neither one will.

So far so good...

The HGP established the baseline for future comparisons to be made against it, not within it.

Whoops! Your logic has evidently failed you here. Consider, IF as much as 12 percent of the human genome is comprised of CNVs (from the article you just read) AND only one percent of the human genome is unique to the individual, AND neither process employed by the HGP can detect CNVs THEN (ergo, lol) the 11 percent of the genome shared by all humans comprised of CNVs is NOT in the database, IS IT? CAN'T BE.

So what does the baseline represent, surely nothing human.

Not true. Period.

It is true and it has been explained. Don't accuse me of certitude when you are incapable of defending your own pronouncements.

CNVs do not invalidate correlations that may be suggested by any other method.

Strawman. No one suggested that CNVs invalidated anything.

Cite the reference, and I'll read it.

Reading it is apparently not enough. Get someone to explain it to you, the concepts have clearly eluded you.

regards,
frog