Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,967.38
(
1.18%
)
US TECH 100
25,118.40
(
-0.10%
)
Dow Jones
48,535.99
(
0.66%
)
Brent Oil
93.73
(
-1.82%
)
Bitcoin
73,954.50
(
-0.33%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 157300
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

risk_it_us

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 1757
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2006

risk_it_us

Re: pokestake post# 73679

Sunday, 04/29/2007 3:30:55 PM

Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:30:55 PM

Post# of 157300
It wasn't a contradiction, I stated in reality I didn't know if he did or not but in opinion and considering the past I'd be inclined to think that he did but that's just a personal opinion without proof.

Why would he do such thing ??? There'd be several reasons in reality but if it did happen I'd have the opinion that it would be to keep the ruskies playing along with a bogus deal that was (again alleged ONLY in the lawsuit) never meant to be real but only to "pad some pockets" and "make investors happy".

Remember that overlypromotional and hype statements from individuals and companies are illegal. If you feel investors are being "rooked" contact the SEC.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today