News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257431
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 624
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/13/2004

Re: DewDiligence post# 45072

Sunday, 04/15/2007 10:02:16 PM

Sunday, April 15, 2007 10:02:16 PM

Post# of 257431
Most of the analysis I have seen is using 17 as the denominator - not the 20 number expected to be randomized into Arm D. The 17 are those receiving 1 or more treatments.

The drop rate in Arm D was much higher than in Prove 1 by the way, 4/17 vs. 11% overall.

It also appears there may be some failures with SVRs judging from the response at 12 weeks measured on an ITT-basis vs. LOC-basis. The LOC basis is significantly higher and represents using the last measurement for droppers.

Jon

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today