News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 1054
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/07/2002

Re: NikLinna post# 9674

Sunday, 11/30/2003 3:10:13 AM

Sunday, November 30, 2003 3:10:13 AM

Post# of 82595
Nik, agree that the important thing is that all possibilities are under consideration. I am always suspicious about concepts like "junk DNA" - underlying mechanisms usually tend to be simple, and such a degree of non-functionality or redundancy seems to be "wrong". BTW, here are some examples of "active" things (transposons or mobile DNA elements) that hint at other possible roles for non-coding DNA:

http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/03/pr0303.htm

http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/news/News_Releases/june97/dna.html

http://dragon.zoo.utoronto.ca/~J02T0301A/Mobile.html

There are also some interesting papers here:

http://instruct.uwo.ca/biology/281b/Tomppt/Notes/

for instance:

http://instruct.uwo.ca/biology/281b/Tomppt/Notes/Class9.pdf


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y