I’ve been thinking about my vote on Amarin and wanted to get some honest feedback from everyone here.
I originally voted NO across the board out of frustration — and I think a lot of us feel that after what this stock has done. But stepping back and looking at it more objectively, I’m starting to question whether that was the right approach.
Here’s where I’m at now:
Sarissa didn’t walk into a healthy company. They walked into a mess — legal overhang, declining revenue, broken sentiment, and a shareholder base that’s been through hell. In the last few years, they’ve at least:
* cut costs
* preserved cash (still sitting on significant reserves)
* explored partnerships/strategic options
* stabilized the business instead of letting it collapse
Has the share price improved? Obviously not. That’s the biggest failure and we all feel it.
But the question I’m asking now is:
**Do we really want to start over again?**
How many times can this company reset before it destroys whatever value is left?
Right now, Sarissa might not be perfect — but they may be the **best chance we have to actually finish something**, whether that’s a partnership, sale, or long-term strategy.
Voting NO on everything might feel justified, but does it:
* weaken the current leadership?
* create more uncertainty?
* push us into another multi-year reset?
I’m not saying they’ve earned a free pass. I’m saying I’m trying to separate frustration from what gives us the best chance going forward.
So I’m reconsidering my vote — at least on directors — because I’m not convinced blowing everything up again helps us.
Curious where everyone else stands on this. Are you sticking with NO across the board, or thinking about it differently now?
Market Data 
Markets 
