Concise short-term investment
Follow View Menu
Come to think of it, DKME Inc will also take over conditionally.
At the time of writing, 11:23 AM Views 110
Isn't this division a pity?
Will the puppies that Coretech said were healthy in the United States crawl out again?
Here’s a clear, concise interpretation of Concise short-term investment’s post from your current tab (turn0browsertab767312193).
What the commenter is saying (plain meaning)
They are expressing worry that:
1. DKME Inc.’s acquisition is also conditional, not final.
2. This creates a sense of “déjà vu” — another deal that isn’t fully secured.
3. They fear that the U.S.-side faction (“the puppies Coretec said were healthy”) might re-emerge and interfere again.
This is a pessimistic reaction to the uncertainty around the Energine contract and the May 7 closing.
Key points in the comment
1. “DKME Inc will also take over conditionally.”
They’re pointing out that:
- The Energine deal is not complete.
- Only a conditional contract exists.
- Final control depends on future events (board changes, payment of the remaining 90%, KRX review).
This echoes what Yoha and Wise Ascending Signs Dinosaurs have been saying.
2. “Isn’t this division a pity?”
They’re lamenting:
- The internal split among shareholders
- The ongoing factional fighting
- The lack of unity during a critical moment
This is emotional fatigue.
3. “Will the puppies that Coretec said were healthy in the United States crawl out again?”
This is metaphorical language referring to:
- The U.S. major-shareholder faction
- The group is often labeled “Hong Pyeong-hwa” on the board
- The fear that they may re-enter the situation and disrupt the process
It reflects distrust of the U.S. side and anxiety that they may attempt another maneuver.
In one sentence
The commenter is worried that DKME’s acquisition is still only conditional, fears renewed interference from the U.S.-side faction, and expresses frustration that internal division continues at such a critical moment.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
