Coretec Group Inc (CRTG)

[Juststoppingby]

Yes, this has been interesting, learned a lot about the Korean market.
m.stock.naver.com DKME board has been on fire. For DKME not to get delisted, KRX is the final say.
Looks like a lot of the commenters don't think this will be proved by KRX.
Following is a post by 1 commenter.

Brilliant Korean Exchange Rate High Ranker
Follow View Menu
Now is the time to fact-check.
At the time of writing, 44 minutes ago, Views 83
It is time for the opposing side to come forward with the argument of the representative of Soju.
So what are the facts?
Is it true that the public sale proceeded normally?
Is it a normal sale recognized by Samil?
Has the sale been agreed upon with the second-largest shareholder according to the joint agreement between the two major shareholders? (But why was the friendly share, that is, the volume of the second largest shareholder, not sold?)
Is all this a bright red lie or the truth of the representative of Soju? If it is false, the representative of Soju will naturally be punished by law. However, if it is true, I am very concerned about the exchange's eligibility judgment.
Lords, don't be swayed by Kadera. Just look at the facts.

Here’s a clear, structured explanation of what Brilliant Korean Exchange Rate High Ranker is saying on the page you’re viewing (tab ID 767312125) .
This post is essentially a call for a reality-based audit of the competing claims made by the Soju Solidarity representative versus the opposing faction.

🌐 Core Message
The commenter is saying:
> “Stop listening to rumors. It’s time to fact-check the Soju representative’s claims.
> If he lied, he would be punished.
> If he told the truth, then the exchange’s eligibility judgment becomes very concerning.”
This is a *neutral-sounding but skeptical* stance aimed at forcing clarity.

1. “Is it true that the public sale proceeded normally?”
They are questioning:
- Was the public sale conducted properly?
- Were procedures followed?
- Was the process legitimate?
This targets the heart of the current board conflict.

2. “Is it a normal sale recognized by Samil?”
They want to know:
- Did Samil Accounting (the supervisor) recognize the sale?
- Or was the sale outside the supervised tender process?
This is a direct challenge to the claim that the sale was “completed.”

3. “Was the sale agreed upon with the second-largest shareholder?”
They highlight the joint agreement between the two major shareholders.
Their key question:
> If the sale was legitimate, why didn’t the second-largest shareholder sell their friendly shares?
This implies:
- The second-largest shareholder’s silence or non-participation is suspicious.
- It may indicate procedural or qualification issues.

4. “Is the Soju representative lying or telling the truth?”
They frame the situation as binary:
If the Soju representative lied → legal punishment.
If he told the truth → KRX’s eligibility judgment becomes very serious.
This is a warning that the consequences go both ways.

5. “Don’t be swayed by Kadera. Look only at the facts.”
“Kadera” refers to rumor-spreaders, emotional posters, or faction-driven narratives.
The commenter is urging:
- Ignore emotional posts
- Ignore faction propaganda
- Focus only on verifiable facts
- Wait for official announcements
This echoes the rationalist tone of Wise Ascending Signs Dinosaurs.

🧭 In One Sentence
Brilliant Korean Exchange Rate High Ranker is urging shareholders to fact-check the Soju representative’s claims about the sale process, warning that if the claims are false, he will face legal consequences, but if they are true, then KRX’s eligibility judgment becomes extremely serious — and telling everyone to ignore rumor-driven posts and focus only on verifiable facts.