Friday, April 03, 2026 6:18:22 PM
Pgsd, On pricing, here’s a strategy thought on how NWBO can use pricing (and price elasticity) to negotiate labeling discussions on DCVax-L approval. Idea is, not to extract max price, but to leverage the DCVax platform’s advantages to obtain the more important, broader market access.
A strawman scenario on what could be happening between NWBO, MHRA, NICE:
Initial discussions
- Approval: DCVax-L for nGBM + rGBM
- Labeling: DCVax-L used in combination with TMZ and radiation
- Pricing (NHS reimbursement): $300K for 3 years of dosing (manual systems) or $200K (Flaskworks), except that too is “expensive” (3-yr treatment paid upfront)
- DCVax-L used as monotherapy would be considered off-label: means zero reimbursement (not good for patients, example: unmethylated patients don’t benefit from chemo, chemo adds cost to treat side-effects).
Strategic win-win proposal
- NWBO offers:
- Pay-per-dose model: $60K (mfg, 4 doses), $15K each subsequent dose (6 doses/boosters, for 3 yrs), totals $150K
-
- MHRA/NICE grants:
- Approval for nGBM and RGBM indications,
- Conditional approval for use as a monotherapy
- Conditional approval for metastatic brain tumors
- Conditional approval for poly-ICLC as adjuvant
Big picture
- Expanding “GBM only” to “All brain metastases” at min. effectively triples (3X) the addressable market size
- Pay-per-dose is a win for UK’s budget constraints and cash-flow needs (spread pymts)
- Conditional approvals are a win for oncologists and patient’s access
Big picture
- All governments are under budget constraints (UK too)
- All oncologists want efficacy, non-toxic, and immune memory for their patients, and patients too (the DCVax profile)
- NWBO has a unique ability to deliver a manufacture, personalized medicine at scale and at low cost (Flaskworks automation).
IMHO, this is how a small player would disrupt an established oncology market.
A strawman scenario on what could be happening between NWBO, MHRA, NICE:
Initial discussions
- Approval: DCVax-L for nGBM + rGBM
- Labeling: DCVax-L used in combination with TMZ and radiation
- Pricing (NHS reimbursement): $300K for 3 years of dosing (manual systems) or $200K (Flaskworks), except that too is “expensive” (3-yr treatment paid upfront)
- DCVax-L used as monotherapy would be considered off-label: means zero reimbursement (not good for patients, example: unmethylated patients don’t benefit from chemo, chemo adds cost to treat side-effects).
Strategic win-win proposal
- NWBO offers:
- Pay-per-dose model: $60K (mfg, 4 doses), $15K each subsequent dose (6 doses/boosters, for 3 yrs), totals $150K
-
- MHRA/NICE grants:
- Approval for nGBM and RGBM indications,
- Conditional approval for use as a monotherapy
- Conditional approval for metastatic brain tumors
- Conditional approval for poly-ICLC as adjuvant
Big picture
- Expanding “GBM only” to “All brain metastases” at min. effectively triples (3X) the addressable market size
- Pay-per-dose is a win for UK’s budget constraints and cash-flow needs (spread pymts)
- Conditional approvals are a win for oncologists and patient’s access
Big picture
- All governments are under budget constraints (UK too)
- All oncologists want efficacy, non-toxic, and immune memory for their patients, and patients too (the DCVax profile)
- NWBO has a unique ability to deliver a manufacture, personalized medicine at scale and at low cost (Flaskworks automation).
IMHO, this is how a small player would disrupt an established oncology market.
Bullish
Sharing thoughts and opinions. To participate in group due diligence. Motto: Do not be a gullible FUDdable investor.
Recent NWBO News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
