News Focus
News Focus
Followers 149
Posts 16630
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/04/2011

Re: rickn23 post# 62446

Friday, 03/13/2026 2:50:58 PM

Friday, March 13, 2026 2:50:58 PM

Post# of 62469
Had they done Muddy run first (no permit required or if so unlikely to delay) they would have learned everything they eventually learned from Georgia but 4 years earlier. With cash advantage from the production there they could fund the next site - presumably NY STAMP but that was hit by the tribal challenges they should have seen when doing Due diligence.
At that time they had cash to do a second site (Georgia) which may have really helped cash flow but they delayed started spending on Texas as well instead of focussing on one at a time. At least 3 years were wasted between the cancellation of Muddy Run (which they kept from investors) and the eventual Georgia plant
Andy/Paul/Sanjay had no idea how to plan for capital spending against revenue returns.
Shame only one of the three has gone
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent PLUG News