It’s been over 20 years that LQMT has been trading. Although the products have evolved throughout those years to use LQMTs IP, the premise for investing in LQMT as you so eloquently point out have remained exactly the same, almost as if Tony Chung had written your post.
The key takeaways in your accurate assessment are simply these words, which never change both past and in present: “market speculation, “may finally utilize “ “expected to launch” “predicted” “expect updates “ “potential contracts “
All of these forward looking words are embedded since LQMTs IPO, in the minds of every outside share holder. From the baseball bat and tennis racket to the huge market of the tire pressure sensor to today’s cellphone hinge.
None of them (those expectations, predictions and “may” words or “finally “ words) have resulted anywhere near a significant contract. Had product ideas of the past had done so. LQMT would not be in the situation they are now in today. They would be the sole owners of this IP today worldwide and manufacturing their products would be at their discretion and not of the discretion of a distant partnership abroad.
Sounds like we just read the EOY call in advance.
Thank you for that upbeat accurate assessment of all hope and expected revenues.
I think it is more accurately expressed in French as Déjà vu.
All of what you state may possibly materialize. But none of what you state connects LQMT to any direct contracts for revenues. The IP used by Apple and any enhancement is Apple’s given away by LQMT. The same for Eontec to use.
The huge benefits to LQMT as of now, if all what you say materializes, will be the free marketing LQMT receives from the hinge’s success by Apple for LQMT to use in selling their IP in all other endeavors of auto, robotics, space, defense etc., through directly contracting and or through partnerships.
My opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share, I do hope yours are worth a lot more.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
