| Followers | 55 |
| Posts | 17690 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Friday, January 30, 2026 10:18:39 AM
His post was in NO WAY "deceiving"!
The FACT remains that you didn't do the math! The two splits taken together EQUAL a 1 for 100,000 share reverse split!
If an investor had 500,000 shares, after the first split he/she would have 5,000 shares. After the second split, he/she would have FIVE shares - effectively a 1 for 100,000 share reverse split.
Now that he has PROVEN that math, YOU deflect with your comment about a "stomping child". This so often happens when those like YOU cannot find a way to stop the truth from being shown.
The FACT remains that you didn't do the math! The two splits taken together EQUAL a 1 for 100,000 share reverse split!
If an investor had 500,000 shares, after the first split he/she would have 5,000 shares. After the second split, he/she would have FIVE shares - effectively a 1 for 100,000 share reverse split.
Now that he has PROVEN that math, YOU deflect with your comment about a "stomping child". This so often happens when those like YOU cannot find a way to stop the truth from being shown.
Bearish
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
