Thursday, December 18, 2025 2:24:47 PM
hi Krisgo
sure no problem
************************
Dear MHRA,
I have a technical question regarding the UK national assessment procedure for ATMP Marketing Authorisation Applications (MAAs).
If an applicant submits an MAA based on a specific manufacturing process and facility configuration (for example, a particular cleanroom grade, equipment set, or manual workflow), and during the review the applicant updates the CMC package to incorporate a different manufacturing approach (such as a new automated system, equipment upgrade, or a move from Grade B to Grade C cleanrooms):
Does the MHRA require the revised manufacturing process to be fully qualified, GMP-inspected, and reflected in the manufacturer’s licence (MIA) before the MA can be granted?
Would the MHRA continue assessing the original manufacturing process described in the initial dossier, or would the review pause until the updated process is inspected, qualified and accepted?
In such cases, does MHRA classify the resulting timeline impact as a regulatory “clock-stop” on the sponsor’s side, rather than an MHRA backlog?
If the manufacturing process has been updated during the review, is it still possible for the MHRA to grant a Marketing Authorisation based solely on the original process described in the initial submission, even if the applicant no longer intends to commercialise that original process? Or must the MA reflect the updated commercial manufacturing route?
For clarity, this is a general procedural question about ATMP CMC management during an ongoing assessment. No company-specific information is being requested.
Thank you very much for your guidance.
Kind regards,
******************
sure no problem
************************
Dear MHRA,
I have a technical question regarding the UK national assessment procedure for ATMP Marketing Authorisation Applications (MAAs).
If an applicant submits an MAA based on a specific manufacturing process and facility configuration (for example, a particular cleanroom grade, equipment set, or manual workflow), and during the review the applicant updates the CMC package to incorporate a different manufacturing approach (such as a new automated system, equipment upgrade, or a move from Grade B to Grade C cleanrooms):
Does the MHRA require the revised manufacturing process to be fully qualified, GMP-inspected, and reflected in the manufacturer’s licence (MIA) before the MA can be granted?
Would the MHRA continue assessing the original manufacturing process described in the initial dossier, or would the review pause until the updated process is inspected, qualified and accepted?
In such cases, does MHRA classify the resulting timeline impact as a regulatory “clock-stop” on the sponsor’s side, rather than an MHRA backlog?
If the manufacturing process has been updated during the review, is it still possible for the MHRA to grant a Marketing Authorisation based solely on the original process described in the initial submission, even if the applicant no longer intends to commercialise that original process? Or must the MA reflect the updated commercial manufacturing route?
For clarity, this is a general procedural question about ATMP CMC management during an ongoing assessment. No company-specific information is being requested.
Thank you very much for your guidance.
Kind regards,
******************
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
