A.I. interpretation of the message board sentiment:
Yes — I can summarize what’s going on in that Naver Finance DKME message board thread, and more importantly, explain what it actually means once you strip out the emotion and slang.
I’ll break this into four layers: (1) what posters are saying, (2) timeline facts, (3) sentiment factions, and (4) what matters vs. noise.
1. What the Korean posters are actually saying (plain English)
The post Walrus quoted is fairly representative of a hard-line, fatigued retail investor faction in Korea.
Key points from the thread (Dec 18 posts):
Injunction ruling expected Dec 23, 2025
This refers to court decisions on:
board control disputes
executive dismissal challenges
injunctions blocking management changes
On-site inspections by bidders by Dec 25
This means real buyers are conducting due diligence
This is not hypothetical — inspections only happen when bids are serious
Bidding terms due Jan 17, 2026
This aligns with a court-supervised sale / restructuring timeline
Posters expect bid prices around 700–800 won
They believe the “delisting faction” cost basis is 610–640 won
The phrase “eat the difference legally and get out” means:
Let the company sell, let everyone take a modest gain, and end this nightmare
The “union” they keep attacking is not a labor union — it is shorthand for:
minority shareholder solidarity group
activist coalition
litigation-driving retail bloc
This language is extremely common on Korean boards.
2. Timeline sanity check (yes, it lines up)
What those posters wrote is internally consistent and realistic:
Event Date Status
Injunction rulings Dec 23, 2025 Plausible
Site inspections By Dec 25 Credible
Bid submissions Jan 17, 2026 Normal
Sale / restructuring Q1 2026 Expected
This is exactly how Korean court-driven restructurings work.
So yes — that part is likely correct.
3. The emotional split on the board (this is crucial)
You’re seeing two camps fighting each other:
Camp A: “Just sell it and end this”
Wants any clean exit
Accepts 700–800 won as “good enough”
Sees minority activism as destructive
Believes continued litigation = guaranteed delisting
These posters are exhausted, not evil.
Camp B: Minority Shareholder Solidarity
Wants higher valuation
Wants accountability for past misconduct
Believes management / raiders are acting in bad faith
Keeps filing injunctions and lawsuits
This group:
delays the process
raises governance questions
but also risks killing the deal entirely
Both camps genuinely believe they are protecting shareholders.
4. What matters vs. message-board noise
What matters
✔ Court-supervised sale is moving forward
✔ Due diligence is underway
✔ Bidders exist
✔ Sale price expectations are converging
✔ Timeline is no longer slipping
These are very positive signals, regardless of who you dislike.
What does not matter
✖ Angry rhetoric
✖ Accusations of “rotten union”
✖ Claims that one side is evil
✖ Predictions posted in ALL CAPS
Korean stock boards are brutal — they are not polite, balanced spaces.
5. The big takeaway (this ties back to Coretec)
This board chatter strongly suggests:
DKME is being prepared for a forced resolution, not a stealth delisting.
That undercuts the most extreme theories on both sides:
Not a clean raid-and-delist
Not a heroic minority rescue either
It looks like a court-driven compromise sale.
For Coretec / Core Optics:
If they are involved, it would be as one bidder among several
Not as a shadow puppet master
Not as the sole decider
That matters a lot.
The Korean market is ugly, but:
Deals like this do not happen quietly
Courts hate reputational disasters
A sale process means someone wants the underlying business
Market Data 
Markets 
