Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,522.00
(
0.33%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
91.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
73,403.45
(
0.05%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 828159
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

HappyLibrarian

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 65
Posts 10174
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/29/2015

HappyLibrarian

Re: seekinganswers post# 800281

Sunday, 11/30/2025 5:40:39 PM

Sunday, November 30, 2025 5:40:39 PM

Post# of 828159

JAMA Oncology did not publish a peer-reviewed article based on scientifically invalid results.

YES THEY DID
IMO



Ok so is your opinion that of a layperson or do you have expertise that outstrips all the combined expertise of the authors and the peer reviewers.

What would be the motivation for all of these people to promote allegedly scientifically invalid data?

NWBO is not well resourced or connected so it is hard to see corruption being involved.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent NWBO News
More NWBO News