Thursday, November 20, 2025 4:37:56 PM
You’re misunderstanding what I’ve been saying, so let me summarize it clearly.
I never said that Flaskworks is required for MHRA approval. That’s not my point. What I’ve said is this:
Over the past two years, NWBO likely realized that manual production would not be reimbursable under NICE/MHRA economic assessments. Because of that, and for other practical reasons, NWBO appears to have voluntarily added a CMC expansion (Flaskworks/Eden) midway through the review process probably around mid-2024.
Once the sponsor voluntarily expands the CMC package, the regulator must evaluate the added data. That puts all the standard review timelines off the table. This is completely normal and has happened dozens of times in other ATMP reviews.
So the point is not “MHRA requires Flaskworks for approval.”
The point is: if NWBO adds the automation pathway during review, MHRA must respond to it, and that naturally extends the timeline. That’s the regulatory logic here
Its up to you what to believe of course.
I never said that Flaskworks is required for MHRA approval. That’s not my point. What I’ve said is this:
Over the past two years, NWBO likely realized that manual production would not be reimbursable under NICE/MHRA economic assessments. Because of that, and for other practical reasons, NWBO appears to have voluntarily added a CMC expansion (Flaskworks/Eden) midway through the review process probably around mid-2024.
Once the sponsor voluntarily expands the CMC package, the regulator must evaluate the added data. That puts all the standard review timelines off the table. This is completely normal and has happened dozens of times in other ATMP reviews.
So the point is not “MHRA requires Flaskworks for approval.”
The point is: if NWBO adds the automation pathway during review, MHRA must respond to it, and that naturally extends the timeline. That’s the regulatory logic here
Its up to you what to believe of course.
Recent NWBO News
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
