| Followers | 200 |
| Posts | 25596 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 04/03/2010 |
Thursday, November 06, 2025 7:48:50 AM
Hi Doc,
Standard of Care or ("SOC") is also a U.S. legal concept.
In the U.S.:
Definition:
The standard of care is generally defined as “the level and type of care that a reasonably competent and skilled health care professional, with a similar background and in the same medical community, would have provided under the same or similar circumstances.”
Legal Standing:
Unlike the UK, there is no single codified document or government-issued SOC in the U.S. Instead, it is a legal concept used in malpractice litigation. Courts rely on expert testimony, medical guidelines, and professional consensus to determine what the SOC was in a given case.
• Sources of SOC:
• Peer-reviewed medical literature
• Specialty society guidelines (e.g., American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Heart Association)
• FDA-approved labeling and accepted treatment protocols
• Expert witness testimony in court
• Common clinical practice patterns
Legal Implications:
Failure to meet the standard of care can form the basis for a medical malpractice claim. If a physician deviates from the SOC and harm results, it may be considered negligence.
However, unlike the UK description, the burden of proof remains on the plaintiff (the patient or their representative) to show that the doctor breached the SOC and that the breach caused harm — not the other way around.
In summary:
SOC is both a recognized and legally relevant concept in the U.S., but:
• It is not a formal guideline or law; rather, it’s a standard used in legal and professional evaluation.
• It can evolve as new evidence (like from DCVax-L or poly-ICLC + pembrolizumab combinations) becomes widely accepted in clinical practice or published in major medical guidelines.
Standard of Care or ("SOC") is also a U.S. legal concept.
In the U.S.:
Definition:
The standard of care is generally defined as “the level and type of care that a reasonably competent and skilled health care professional, with a similar background and in the same medical community, would have provided under the same or similar circumstances.”
Legal Standing:
Unlike the UK, there is no single codified document or government-issued SOC in the U.S. Instead, it is a legal concept used in malpractice litigation. Courts rely on expert testimony, medical guidelines, and professional consensus to determine what the SOC was in a given case.
• Sources of SOC:
• Peer-reviewed medical literature
• Specialty society guidelines (e.g., American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Heart Association)
• FDA-approved labeling and accepted treatment protocols
• Expert witness testimony in court
• Common clinical practice patterns
Legal Implications:
Failure to meet the standard of care can form the basis for a medical malpractice claim. If a physician deviates from the SOC and harm results, it may be considered negligence.
However, unlike the UK description, the burden of proof remains on the plaintiff (the patient or their representative) to show that the doctor breached the SOC and that the breach caused harm — not the other way around.
In summary:
SOC is both a recognized and legally relevant concept in the U.S., but:
• It is not a formal guideline or law; rather, it’s a standard used in legal and professional evaluation.
• It can evolve as new evidence (like from DCVax-L or poly-ICLC + pembrolizumab combinations) becomes widely accepted in clinical practice or published in major medical guidelines.
Bullish
I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.
Recent NWBO News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
