News Focus
News Focus
Followers 13
Posts 6825
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2017

Re: quester614 post# 38652

Monday, 10/06/2025 2:53:51 PM

Monday, October 06, 2025 2:53:51 PM

Post# of 39718
Maybe we'll start with the courts saying that XTI did notify XERI that they had IN FACT received a notice of DEFAULT with an opportunity to cure the default. What BS does SIO have NOW after 4 years of saying that didn't happen. He should just STFU and leave like SP2 since he lost 2 bets. That's where your SOLE DISCRETION should comes into play. LOL
Looks like XTI gets to keep their TF600 IP "due to Xeriant’s breach and by the Agreement’s own terms; all technology and intellectual property developed through the joint venture has reverted exclusively to XTI;"
III.Discussion A.Breach of Contract
The SAAC additionally alleges that XTI performed its obligations under the Agreement and provided Xeriant with notice of its default and an opportunity to cure the default. (Id. ¶¶ 225, 227.) (pg5)


C.Declaratory Judgment Count III of the SAAC seeks declaratory judgment from this Court declaring that: the May 17 Letter has expired by its terms and is invalid and unenforceable; the Agreement has been terminated due to Xeriant’s breach and by the Agreement’s own terms; all technology and intellectual property developed through the joint venture has reverted exclusively to XTI; and Xeriant has no further rights or interests in the VTOL Technology or any joint venture assets. (SAAC ¶ 240.)
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2023cv10656/611598/98/
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent XERI News