NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[Slave1]

Mike, ChatGPT doesn’t work the way you’re suggesting. It doesn’t just tell people what they want to hear. It evaluates logic, structure, and factual consistency,  not emotional framing. If someone pastes in a post and asks, “Why is this wrong?” the model doesn’t blindly agree. It analyzes the argument based on what’s written. If the logic is sound, it will say so. If the reasoning is flawed, it will explain why. It doesn’t care who is asking the question, it cares whether the argument holds up.

So if you had actually pasted my post in and gotten a response that dismantled it, you would have shown that. You wouldn’t be talking about the prompt. You wouldn’t be leading with emojis. You would be quoting the response, word for word. Instead, you’re focused on insinuating that the question was “leading,” or that I somehow manipulated the tool to get the answer I wanted, which, ironically, says more about how you would use the tool than how I did.


Also, just for the record, if you tried to alter the output after the fact, it would be obvious. ChatGPT responses follow a recognizable structure. Anyone who uses it regularly knows what those outputs look like. If you slice out one paragraph or edit a line to make it look more favorable, people will spot it instantly. That’s why the only way to do this transparently is to show the full exchange,  the actual prompt, the full response, and the context. Anything less and you’re not proving a point. You’re curating one.


And yes, ChatGPT can absolutely tell when a post is misleading. It’s trained to spot logic gaps, causal reversals, missing steps, false dichotomies, and unsupported claims. If someone posts a message that sounds confident but cuts corners, skips procedures, or ignores documented regulatory structures,  it flags it. That’s why people use it. Not because it picks sides, but because it picks patterns. If your argument is strong, the model will reflect that. If it’s not, it won’t.


So if you still believe your version of events is correct, just post the full ChatGPT exchange. No edits. No cropped screenshots. The entire thread. And I’ll post mine. No games. Let people read both and decide which one respects the facts and which one edits around them. But if you are not willing to show yours in full, then you’ve already told us how the conversation really went.