Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,506.00
(
0.28%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
91.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
73,465.13
(
0.13%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 518941
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

LakeshoreLeo1953

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 36
Posts 11729
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2016

LakeshoreLeo1953

Re: sab63090 post# 494187

Friday, 07/18/2025 8:32:17 AM

Friday, July 18, 2025 8:32:17 AM

Post# of 518941
Would you at least agree that a lead technician for a CRO signing
the review has NO clue as to the efficacy claims made by the lead author?
Likewise, RWE observations were not the product of Dr. McFarlane's direct involvement?

Without challenging the competence or veracity of any signature,
It just seems ridiculous to assume every reviewer approves of every
statement in the paper.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AVXL News
More AVXL News