News Focus
News Focus
Followers 61
Posts 571
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2021

Re: exwannabe post# 774388

Sunday, 07/06/2025 11:51:24 AM

Sunday, July 06, 2025 11:51:24 AM

Post# of 817994
You’re completely missing the point, so let’s break it down simply:

In 2022, the MHRA approved a Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) for DCVax-L that used the same matched external control methodology as the adult Phase 3 trial. That means the MHRA formally accepted the design as valid for regulatory use. It’s right there in the public PIP summary:

“The PIP is based on the same study design as the adult Phase III trial, with a contemporaneous matched external control group instead of a randomized control.”

    MHRA PIP Summary, July 2022 (P/223/2022)

That approval alone undercuts your entire argument.
Let’s walk through your claims:

1. “It’s not pivotal.”

Irrelevant. The significance isn’t in the phase, it’s in the MHRA’s acceptance of the evidence model. They didn’t just allow exploration. They allowed regulatory development using the exact same ECA-based framework. That’s not common, and it’s not accidental.

2. “Prespecified means before enrollment.”

Yes, and that’s exactly what happened. The use of external controls was pre-declared in the adult trial’s protocol and approved by regulators. The MHRA’s own guidance talks about prespecification because it’s a bar for trustworthiness, not a gotcha. DCVax-L cleared it.

3. “It’s not the same SAP.”

That’s just false. The pediatric plan explicitly adopted the adult trial design, including its control methodology and endpoints. Adjustments in secondary endpoints do not change the fact that the survival analysis structure, the backbone of both trials, is shared.

And as for your claim that the PIP “won’t be used”? That’s pure speculation. The submission of the PIP was a legal requirement under EU and UK law to advance the MAA. It wasn’t “hype.” It was regulatory groundwork, and it was approved.

You can dislike Linda Powers all you want, but this isn’t about her. The MHRA made a clear, documented decision. They accepted the same trial design you’re claiming is disqualifying. That’s not marketing spin. That’s regulatory precedent.
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News