Sunday, July 06, 2025 11:51:24 AM
You’re completely missing the point, so let’s break it down simply:
In 2022, the MHRA approved a Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) for DCVax-L that used the same matched external control methodology as the adult Phase 3 trial. That means the MHRA formally accepted the design as valid for regulatory use. It’s right there in the public PIP summary:
“The PIP is based on the same study design as the adult Phase III trial, with a contemporaneous matched external control group instead of a randomized control.”
MHRA PIP Summary, July 2022 (P/223/2022)
That approval alone undercuts your entire argument.
Let’s walk through your claims:
1. “It’s not pivotal.”
Irrelevant. The significance isn’t in the phase, it’s in the MHRA’s acceptance of the evidence model. They didn’t just allow exploration. They allowed regulatory development using the exact same ECA-based framework. That’s not common, and it’s not accidental.
2. “Prespecified means before enrollment.”
Yes, and that’s exactly what happened. The use of external controls was pre-declared in the adult trial’s protocol and approved by regulators. The MHRA’s own guidance talks about prespecification because it’s a bar for trustworthiness, not a gotcha. DCVax-L cleared it.
3. “It’s not the same SAP.”
That’s just false. The pediatric plan explicitly adopted the adult trial design, including its control methodology and endpoints. Adjustments in secondary endpoints do not change the fact that the survival analysis structure, the backbone of both trials, is shared.
And as for your claim that the PIP “won’t be used”? That’s pure speculation. The submission of the PIP was a legal requirement under EU and UK law to advance the MAA. It wasn’t “hype.” It was regulatory groundwork, and it was approved.
You can dislike Linda Powers all you want, but this isn’t about her. The MHRA made a clear, documented decision. They accepted the same trial design you’re claiming is disqualifying. That’s not marketing spin. That’s regulatory precedent.
In 2022, the MHRA approved a Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) for DCVax-L that used the same matched external control methodology as the adult Phase 3 trial. That means the MHRA formally accepted the design as valid for regulatory use. It’s right there in the public PIP summary:
“The PIP is based on the same study design as the adult Phase III trial, with a contemporaneous matched external control group instead of a randomized control.”
MHRA PIP Summary, July 2022 (P/223/2022)
That approval alone undercuts your entire argument.
Let’s walk through your claims:
1. “It’s not pivotal.”
Irrelevant. The significance isn’t in the phase, it’s in the MHRA’s acceptance of the evidence model. They didn’t just allow exploration. They allowed regulatory development using the exact same ECA-based framework. That’s not common, and it’s not accidental.
2. “Prespecified means before enrollment.”
Yes, and that’s exactly what happened. The use of external controls was pre-declared in the adult trial’s protocol and approved by regulators. The MHRA’s own guidance talks about prespecification because it’s a bar for trustworthiness, not a gotcha. DCVax-L cleared it.
3. “It’s not the same SAP.”
That’s just false. The pediatric plan explicitly adopted the adult trial design, including its control methodology and endpoints. Adjustments in secondary endpoints do not change the fact that the survival analysis structure, the backbone of both trials, is shared.
And as for your claim that the PIP “won’t be used”? That’s pure speculation. The submission of the PIP was a legal requirement under EU and UK law to advance the MAA. It wasn’t “hype.” It was regulatory groundwork, and it was approved.
You can dislike Linda Powers all you want, but this isn’t about her. The MHRA made a clear, documented decision. They accepted the same trial design you’re claiming is disqualifying. That’s not marketing spin. That’s regulatory precedent.
Bullish
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:38:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
