| Followers | 54 |
| Posts | 17662 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Tuesday, July 01, 2025 1:17:00 PM
It's very unlikely that DBMM will EVER do a "preferred share dividend".
You are pissing up a rope.
We've been over this a DOZEN TIMES. Let's say that Linda didn't have a clue if there actually WAS a giant "naked share" position, but even slightly suspected there MIGHT BE one? Then what in the WORLD would stop her from doing ALL SHE COULD to EXPOSE it? Exposing it would ONLY HELP her, the shareholders and the company!
So, tell me Krom, WHAT is STOPPING HER in that situation? Yet it hasn't happened in ALL the time this "naked share" position has been rumored!
BUT - (as discussed here time AFTER TIME )- if she KNEW there was no short position? That would explain her inaction. She KNOWS that the MAJORITY of people holding shares in this POS company are doing so based on the rumor of a giant "naked short" squeeze, and the resultant chance to profit on it. IF she did some sort of action to try and expose a position SHE KNOWS DOESN'T EXIST? And the result of that action made it plain that there WAS no "naked short" position?
It would be the KISS OF DEATH for DBMM!
Shareholders would suddenly become cognizant of the FACT that the only viable way of making money off DBMM (short squeeze) has ended. DBMM would largely sell off, very quickly.
There is NO OTHER explanation that makes sense.
I say the only "viable" way because the ONLY other way is if DBMM suddenly starts performing business-wise. We can all see how the "business" is progressing in 2025. NO client signings means NO new revenue. The "business" is tanking - big time. There's VERY LITTLE CHANCE of seeing the stock rise from DBMM's business dealings.
You are pissing up a rope.
We've been over this a DOZEN TIMES. Let's say that Linda didn't have a clue if there actually WAS a giant "naked share" position, but even slightly suspected there MIGHT BE one? Then what in the WORLD would stop her from doing ALL SHE COULD to EXPOSE it? Exposing it would ONLY HELP her, the shareholders and the company!
So, tell me Krom, WHAT is STOPPING HER in that situation? Yet it hasn't happened in ALL the time this "naked share" position has been rumored!
BUT - (as discussed here time AFTER TIME )- if she KNEW there was no short position? That would explain her inaction. She KNOWS that the MAJORITY of people holding shares in this POS company are doing so based on the rumor of a giant "naked short" squeeze, and the resultant chance to profit on it. IF she did some sort of action to try and expose a position SHE KNOWS DOESN'T EXIST? And the result of that action made it plain that there WAS no "naked short" position?
It would be the KISS OF DEATH for DBMM!
Shareholders would suddenly become cognizant of the FACT that the only viable way of making money off DBMM (short squeeze) has ended. DBMM would largely sell off, very quickly.
There is NO OTHER explanation that makes sense.
I say the only "viable" way because the ONLY other way is if DBMM suddenly starts performing business-wise. We can all see how the "business" is progressing in 2025. NO client signings means NO new revenue. The "business" is tanking - big time. There's VERY LITTLE CHANCE of seeing the stock rise from DBMM's business dealings.
Bearish
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
