Thursday, June 19, 2025 12:04:09 AM
If I remember correctly, CHM have schedules established for what they're reviewing. I don't believe any such review has been scheduled. If I'm wrong, let me know.
I don't doubt that the company and regulators have had substantial communications. I believe the regulators do intend to approve, so the question is, what are they approving. Have the discussions been about expanding the label, or have they been about the EDEN, or strictly an approval for GBM alone. Are they requiring a confirmational trial, and could it be the protocol for that trial that's taking so long.
If I were NWBO, I would want to be permitted the addition of Poly-ICLC and/or Keytruda with DCVax-L in a trial, whether it's considered confirmational, or not. The last thing I'd want to do is another monotherapy trial with what I know is possible with the addition of other therapeutics.
All I'm suggesting is that the company may be pushing hard to do things right. While approval is the key, if they had a chance at tumor agnostic, spent a few extra months trying to get there, but ultimately failed, I believe it was still worth the try. We'll really never know as the story will never be told. On the other hand, if they do get a tumor agnostic label, I think it's fair to believe it extended the time it took to get the yes.
Gary
I don't doubt that the company and regulators have had substantial communications. I believe the regulators do intend to approve, so the question is, what are they approving. Have the discussions been about expanding the label, or have they been about the EDEN, or strictly an approval for GBM alone. Are they requiring a confirmational trial, and could it be the protocol for that trial that's taking so long.
If I were NWBO, I would want to be permitted the addition of Poly-ICLC and/or Keytruda with DCVax-L in a trial, whether it's considered confirmational, or not. The last thing I'd want to do is another monotherapy trial with what I know is possible with the addition of other therapeutics.
All I'm suggesting is that the company may be pushing hard to do things right. While approval is the key, if they had a chance at tumor agnostic, spent a few extra months trying to get there, but ultimately failed, I believe it was still worth the try. We'll really never know as the story will never be told. On the other hand, if they do get a tumor agnostic label, I think it's fair to believe it extended the time it took to get the yes.
Gary
Bullish
Recent NWBO News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
