If the company knew for certain there was no naked short position, the smartest and fastest way to silence that narrative forever would be to take the very action I’ve described.
Expose it. Prove it doesn’t exist. Game over.
DBMM is surviving by having the great majority of their shareholders believing in DBMM having a GIANT naked short share position. Linda does not WANT to "silence that narrative"! She DEPENDS upon it!
If Linda took any actions to prove such a position exits and it does NOT exist (as I believe she well knows)? And her action finally proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that there really is NO Naked share position? The stock price would collapse, as shareholders sold their positions.
We know that DBMM is failing as a business. The financials show that. So, the ONLY thing that is propping up the share price is shareholders thinking they still might get rich from a squeeze! Once they know that isn't going to happen, they will bail, the stock price will go down into $.0000001 territory and DBMM will NEVER have a chance of ANY "upgrade", "uplist" or any other positive event.
Expose it. Prove it doesn’t exist. Game over.
You're crazy! Proving it doesn't exist will drive DBMM into the ground! Linda is reliant upon the NSS theory remaining alive and well. To destroy THAT will destroy DBMM. She knows it is FAR better to let that belief linger on.