When I say this "case" is to the legal world what ENZC is to drug stocks, this is exactly what I mean.
When it comes to steps that WOULD lead to something important, "we will be paying the retainer next week", we get posts with updates. But note, never do we get, "we paid the retainer to xxx firm today". This is just like ENZC with their telling us African "testing" was about to begin, and then nothing. It's all "show", and in Terry's case, name calling responses.
Again, if he did 1/10th of the work due proper due diligence before he bought ENZC vs all the standing on his head thinking of ways to attempt to show progress without actually showing any real progress, he could have avoided all these losses.
How much long can he keep up this charade? It's close to 7 months now!