Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[DaJester]

You keep saying the same things and asking the same questions, and continue to misread the situation.

The jury verdict can still be appealed, was for a pittance in damages, and has no precedential power at all.

And pray tell all-knowing KThomp - what percentage probability do you give to the Lamberth verdict getting appealed and overturned? Are you just stating a possibility, or are you assigning a probability there, hypocrite? 🙄 As for no precedential power - you couldn't be more wrong. The verdict clearly indicates the NWS breached the shareholder agreement. We've been through this before. This makes future breaches LESS likely, not more likely.

But why would those new methods be better for FnF legacy common than they were for AIG?

I don't think you understand how to account for something new happening. Your methods must only rely on what you have seen in the past? I don't know, and don't care. You are discounting a whole slew of possibilities, that together have a greater probability of occurring than your "most likely" scenario. If you think you know what is most likely to happen, great - place your bets. And if you must berate the people who evaluate the situation differently, please continue your nonsense. You aren't convincing anyone that you have a more accurate prediction method.