Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,400.96
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
28,515.20
(
0.80%
)
Dow Jones
49,760.56
(
0.11%
)
Brent Oil
105.26
(
-0.48%
)
Bitcoin
81,179.10
(
0.86%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 447904
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Number sleven

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 35
Posts 8890
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/04/2020

Number sleven

Re: north40000 post# 433388

Tuesday, 02/25/2025 8:05:17 PM

Tuesday, February 25, 2025 8:05:17 PM

Post# of 447904
North, 180 is a notification of service. I don't see any details involving the argument for invalidity. I am a bit surprised that Hikma doesn't oppose the meaning of the wording in the asserted patents. Either the Hikma legal strategy doesn't rely on contesting the meaning, or they don't think they can invalidate the patents. No reason for the extra expense. I get a sense of panic from the Hikma legal team.
Sleven,
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMRN News
More AMRN News