So, what are you saying AZ? I've backed and supported you every way possible in the past, but this sounds like trickery buffoonery. That returning the signed original WMI common share' release' document back in 2012 was not enough to guarantee participation??? That is what was stated and implied as all the action that was necessary to participate. Then what was the purpose of returning that original release doc? Sounds like a strong case can be made for Gov intervention on top of a lawsuit regardless of the verbiage on the release doc. Certainly NOT an example of Covenant Good Faith and Fair Dealing.