Monday, February 03, 2025 12:15:33 PM
I think you’re wrong about some of these points. For example the MTA clarifies that the cross licensing agreement means that EONTEC is sharing their IP and processes with LQMT. Therefore, sales in lqmt territories where lqmt gets paid would include products/parts made by EONTEC using their IP and processes.
Enforcement is a moot point. Eontec put the territories wording in the document because they plan on paying out revenue to lqmt. Your interpretation totally dismisses this and I believe is erroneous. Again others have argued persuasively for this position. Just because you express your position to others doesn’t mean it’s correct.
Enforcement is a moot point. Eontec put the territories wording in the document because they plan on paying out revenue to lqmt. Your interpretation totally dismisses this and I believe is erroneous. Again others have argued persuasively for this position. Just because you express your position to others doesn’t mean it’s correct.
Recent LQMT News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2026 08:37:19 PM
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 08:02:37 PM
