How do you figure that. Kershaw ERA is 2.50 versus 3.74. That is vastly superior for kershaw. Kershaw whip is 1.01 versus 1.26. Kershaw WP % is almost 700 (absurdly high). Way higher than CC. Kershaw strikeouts more batters per inning. I really don't like making this comps because when your trying to make a case it seems like your putting down the other guy CC is rock solid HOF, just stating kershaw is better and it isn't even close. a 2.50 career era in this day and age is absurdly low in my opinion. Not that I care about wins and losses but he is 118 games over 500, cc is 90.
And the final stat kershaw WAR 79.4 (which is automatic, if your not a ped user), versus 62.3. The number don't lie, Kershaw is way better in my opinion.