AI
| Followers | 318 |
| Posts | 55275 |
| Boards Moderated | 12 |
| Alias Born | 08/19/2009 |
Thursday, December 19, 2024 12:14:37 PM
You really need to talk with someone who understands the law and stop relying on your own confused interpretations of complex, totally unrelated, and mostly political lawsuits!
STOP TRYING TO MISLEAD OTHERS!
First and foremost you are dead wrong about who the critics are here! The bulk of those posting critically here, I believe, are harmed shareholders with no collusion whatsoever aside from a common anger at management for destroying their investment!
Secondly, opinions like "DBMM not long for this world" are protected speech and are definitely NOT defamation! If I, or anyone else, portrayed myself as a financial expert and was giving financial advice to a paying client and said that, sure, that could be actionable. Intelligent and experienced posters stating their personal opinions (most after considerable research) of past similar cases is why iHub is a great site!
I closely watched an attempted lawsuit against iHub posters for defamation that was FAR worse than hurting someone's feelings. The CEO had his subpoena for identities quashed, ended up owing TRIPLE the defendants (iHub's) legal costs, and skipped the country to avoid paying!
If the company is really so damn naive to believe that there are naked shorts posting critically here that are colluding to harm the company, I hope that they have deep pockets and a strong desire for public embarrassment!
STOP TRYING TO MISLEAD OTHERS!
First and foremost you are dead wrong about who the critics are here! The bulk of those posting critically here, I believe, are harmed shareholders with no collusion whatsoever aside from a common anger at management for destroying their investment!
Secondly, opinions like "DBMM not long for this world" are protected speech and are definitely NOT defamation! If I, or anyone else, portrayed myself as a financial expert and was giving financial advice to a paying client and said that, sure, that could be actionable. Intelligent and experienced posters stating their personal opinions (most after considerable research) of past similar cases is why iHub is a great site!
I closely watched an attempted lawsuit against iHub posters for defamation that was FAR worse than hurting someone's feelings. The CEO had his subpoena for identities quashed, ended up owing TRIPLE the defendants (iHub's) legal costs, and skipped the country to avoid paying!
If the company is really so damn naive to believe that there are naked shorts posting critically here that are colluding to harm the company, I hope that they have deep pockets and a strong desire for public embarrassment!
