Boston's research

[boston745]

I have been restricted on my ability to post on the SINT board for well over a year now and I was told that if posting increased on the board that would be lifted. However when ive asked to have my post limit lifted, on several occasions, instead of the restriction being lifted, theres a decrease in posting....particularly by account Jimr1717. Jimr1717 and PioneerPhoenix73 are two accounts that troll me on Sintx and Tesla boards only. Pioneer being a strawpuppet account ive talked about and Jimr job seems to be to post information in the opposite fashion of what i post. If i post about an accident involving an out of control Tesla Jimr responds posting about another manufacturer's car suffering a similar accident to downplay how often Teslas get into accidents and kill people. Jimr also seems to be an AI account like Pioneer. That said, i suspect both have a person posting behind it at times. Most of the time Jimr and Pioneer accounts lack the ability to absorb the information i post the way a person would. Images especially trip them up. They also both struggle discerning quoted statements versus personal statements.
Back to my original point. I suspect Ihub either runs both these accounts, or is in cahoots with whomever does. That would explain why when i ask for them to lift the 3 post limit imposed on Sintx board, those 2 accounts reduces their posting. Also Jimr account tries to get me to flood the Tesla board so the same restriction could be imposed on me there, more difficult feat as Tsla board has higher volume of posting to begin with. Fortunately i learned after the first time they pulled that with me on Sintx board and thus dont allow myself to be sucked in the way Pioneers previous iteration did.

========================================

Theres a disinfo sockpuppet bot account posting absurd things. How to recognize it:

A sock puppet is a false online identity used for deceptive purposes

Strawman sockpuppet

A strawman sockpuppet (sometimes abbreviated as strawpuppet) is a false flag pseudonym created to make a particular point of view look foolish or unwholesome in order to generate negative sentiment against it. Strawman sockpuppets typically behave in an unintelligent, uninformed, or bigoted manner, advancing "straw man" arguments that their puppeteers can easily refute. The intended effect is to discredit more rational arguments made for the same position.
Such sockpuppets behave in a similar manner to Internet trolls.

Strawman disinformation tactic is to take something a person says and change the wording so what is said is different and then refute that. As you can see thats also a tactic of Strawpuppets. You should ask yourself why a disinfo account is being untilized if the core evidence is not accurate?

These sockpuppets are convincing to the untrained eye, utilizing profile pictures of paid actors and employing native slang in their posts. Sockpuppet accounts engage in interactions that mimic genuine discussions, but they are orchestrated by a single source. A puppeteer will use his sockpuppets to have a back-and-forth argument with himself, creating the illusion of spirited debate. Overseers can simultaneously use sockpuppets alongside bots, assuming direct control over a bot’s operations and interjecting with a human post when others become suspicious.

It is therefore necessary to conjure forth their antithesis: the absurdist agent. Regular disinformation tactics render reality unknowable by blending elements of truth and falsehood to contaminate the oasis of information, but the absurdist is a specialized disinformation agent whose provocative persona attaches itself to any authentic truths he advocates. Rather than relying on logos, the absurdist employs pathos, parodying his enemy’s ideology. This serves a dual purpose: it casts an unrelenting shadow of doubt over both the agent’s assertions and his receptive audience.

The absurdist aims to mold the public perception of himself into that of a court jester, a living caricature. Where there is an issue replete with three intersecting points of interest, the absurdist asserts that an unrelated fourth factor is relevant. He promotes factual information for extended periods, only to abruptly pivot and retract his statements. He makes wild assertions without any evidence, and he also champions data that are obviously false. He subjects himself to a series of humiliation rituals that castrate his character. Once the absurdist has established himself as cognitive dissonance incarnate, his persona discredits everything he touches, and anything he utters can be summarily dismissed as the ramblings of a madman.