Tornado Alley (PROG)

[arizona1]

Claims in 'Duty to Warn' Letter to Harris Alleging Compromised Election Are Misleading
Its writer alleged, "In my view it is a near certainty the results have been changed at a scale which reversed the [2024] U.S. presidential election."
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/

..............In Spoonamore's initial Spoutible thread, he wrote, "Now, why the bomb threats? They were NOT to allow for hacker access. The programming was already in place, they were to break chain of custody and produce legal grounds to not trust a recount. Every place that GOT a bomb threat is a place the courts will now have to consider the factual argument of whether the ballots COULD have been tampered with while the evacuations were going on. They weren't. But that is the argument the GOP will make to prevent recounts."

He elaborated in his subsequent letter to Harris:

Lastly, this hack methodology may or may not have some correlation with the series of bomb threats called in by Russian-affiliated assets. The use of distraction or diversion of this kind is common. My first thought was, and my thinking remains, these bomb threats were called into tabulation centers and precincts where the hackers had already planned to conduct ghost bullet ballot introductions. I believe they wanted a disruption in the chain of custody, so lawyers could claim after the hacking events that the chain of custody on the ballots was flawed. The creation of the false-argument of a broken custody chain would be used as a pretext to prevent hand recounting, as hand recounting would not match the Trump favorable result. However, by a reverse of that logic, any jurisdiction which was subject to a bomb threat was forced to break standard operating procedure. This alone should be grounds for you to ask for a hand recount.

As of Nov. 21, Spoonamore's claim that the bomb threats were part of a hacking and fraud scheme, like his claim that Musk was involved in the alleged fraud, remains unsupported by concrete evidence.