Absolutely true, Vein. When you compare LWLG to Lm, you see that Lm has all the things LWLG does not: strategic partnerships, market buzz, third party investments, massive capital raises. LWLG has been dicking around for over twenty years, moving from one incompetent leadership team to the next, with only a handful of patents and zero revenue and customers to show for it. I wrote many years ago on this board that my biggest concern was that, unless we had better management, we would get beaten to the market by a nimbler and better managed and funded company, probably with inferior technology. That reality is playing out now.
The fantasists on this board will claim that if only LWLG weren't bound by dozens of super top secret dome of silence NDAs, we'd all know the truth. Well, as Reanimator pointed out, quite correctly, Lm as well as other tech companies seem to have no such restrictions on publicizing customers, strategic partnerships etc. So, given the invisibility of LWLG to the market (except for shorts, of course) and the complete absence of news, deals, customers, strategic partnerships, analysts, revenue protections, third party investments, I think we have to take the occam's razor view of LWLG: that it is a struggling irrelevancy in the investment and technology worlds.
Market Data 
Markets 
