Ihub is now censoring everything that is considered "political" regardless how it impacts the companies connected to Elon Musk or if Elon Musk is a player in it. Admins removed this as "off-topic" when it illustrates corruption by Mr Musk.
I would suspect he's going to try to merge Trump Social. I've heard from a number of people today with, with X and take it public because it's a meme stock. Now, Trump social already, which is a terrible business. So is X, by the way, X has always been a terrible business. And that was preceding Musk. And now it's worse than ever. But it's they could merge them and make it a meme stock and make a lot of money for themselves. That could be interesting and incredibly corrupt. they could also, he'll use it as a propaganda organ, which is precisely why he bought it. People misunderstood. Good. They kept saying he was losing money, and I think it was very clear it wasn't about money. This is like this was a great investment by Elon Musk and Donald Trump, and that's how he sees it. To make. He spent hundreds of millions to make billions. And he could be our world's first trillionaire. If you're comfortable with a single person who has interests all over the federal government, including $15 billion in contracts deciding things, and I know it's gone on in history, but nothing like this. No one's owned such an organ and such an ability. A public city organ. And that's what it is, a propaganda or an organ that he's created. in this way, it's not the same as before. It is not even close to the same. He has control over a number of important things, and we have to be very careful of a single person doing this, that, that I think in history, that's always been the case.
Where i'll deviate from Swisher is that Musk is not a single person, hes a puppet for the DoD and its the DoD that will continue to use Trump Social/X as a propaganda arm.
Strawman Sockpuppet bot posting disinfo in relation to info in my posts. Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at basic data? Is it an exercise to create forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?