Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[MarcoPolo4]

Wow GP, you really are wound up. This is the most volume of rhetoric I have see you post. It is a good example of the old saying, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit".

Here you go again lumping Perkinamine with other polymers from other sources. I don't argue that TFLN has less insertion loss than polymers from sources other than LWLG. Photostability for Perkinamine is excellent as seen on slide 23 of slide deck 2024 ECOC (same as 2023 ECOC slide 31). The value hovers around 1 and stays fairly consistent over time.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-023-01161-9

This paper discusses the use of Perkinamine 3, a specific type of Perkinamine chromophore, in plasmonic modulators. While it doesn't directly provide insertion loss values for the polymer itself, it mentions that the on-chip insertion losses (ILPB) of the devices using this polymer are as low as 1.2 dB.

Insertion loss can vary depending on factors like the specific device architecture, fabrication process, and/ or operating wavelength. In other words, the value can be up or down depending on the variables.

Here is a post from a few weeks back on the issue of insertion loss. It requires some inferences on my part but it fits the idea that Perkinamine insertion loss is around 1. This might interest others more so than yourself because it is an exercise in following the breadcrumbs.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175166686