Boston's research

[boston745]

More evidence that the information I post is worth looking deeper into is the fact that someone is using a strawpuppet account to essentially troll me while taking the points made in my posts and twisting them to seem absurd. Its a disinformation technique to get people to ignore/dismiss the information im posting as well as create more forum verbiage.
The account is PioneerPhoenix73, previously it used the avatar Entlarvt. Unlike the Entlarvt which trolled me one every board i post, PioneerPhoenix73 seems restricted to SINT & TSLA boards in regards to trolling my posts. Meaning if i post on Apple's/Zimmer Biomet boards, it doesnt follow suite. I suspect that Ihub is behind the account or at least allows it to post on the boards as i've shown information that should have proved that PioneerPhoenix73 is just another incarnation of Entlarvt a banned account. Part of Entlarvt goal was to get me to post so frequently that Ihub restricted me to 3 posts a day on SINT board. a restriction still in place after more than a year. It also got me removed as moderator on the TSLA board because people didnt like my pinned post showing that Teslas/EVs suffer Sudden Unintended Acceleration due to electromagnetic interference. However i simply adapted and changed technique. PioneerPhoenix73 tried to accomplish the same thing on the TSLA board to get me restricted on posts. However they fooled me once, i learned, and thus didnt fall for it again. Point is they employ various techniques to try to censor me and get people to ignore my posts. That means you should look into the information further as they do not want you to do that or this information to spread!

Here is a bit about a disinformation strawpuppet account. PioneerPhoenix73 is a mixture of bot and occasionally someone posting.

A sock puppet is a false online identity used for deceptive purposes

Strawman sockpuppet

A strawman sockpuppet (sometimes abbreviated as strawpuppet) is a false flag pseudonym created to make a particular point of view look foolish or unwholesome in order to generate negative sentiment against it. Strawman sockpuppets typically behave in an unintelligent, uninformed, or bigoted manner, advancing "straw man" arguments that their puppeteers can easily refute. The intended effect is to discredit more rational arguments made for the same position.
Such sockpuppets behave in a similar manner to Internet trolls.

Strawman disinformation tactic is to take something a person says and change the wording so what is said is different and then refute that. As you can see thats also a tactic of Strawpuppets. You should ask yourself why a disinfo account is being untilized if the core evidence is not accurate?

These sockpuppets are convincing to the untrained eye, utilizing profile pictures of paid actors and employing native slang in their posts. Sockpuppet accounts engage in interactions that mimic genuine discussions, but they are orchestrated by a single source. A puppeteer will use his sockpuppets to have a back-and-forth argument with himself, creating the illusion of spirited debate. Overseers can simultaneously use sockpuppets alongside bots, assuming direct control over a bot’s operations and interjecting with a human post when others become suspicious.

It is therefore necessary to conjure forth their antithesis: the absurdist agent. Regular disinformation tactics render reality unknowable by blending elements of truth and falsehood to contaminate the oasis of information, but the absurdist is a specialized disinformation agent whose provocative persona attaches itself to any authentic truths he advocates. Rather than relying on logos, the absurdist employs pathos, parodying his enemy’s ideology. This serves a dual purpose: it casts an unrelenting shadow of doubt over both the agent’s assertions and his receptive audience.

The absurdist aims to mold the public perception of himself into that of a court jester, a living caricature. Where there is an issue replete with three intersecting points of interest, the absurdist asserts that an unrelated fourth factor is relevant. He promotes factual information for extended periods, only to abruptly pivot and retract his statements. He makes wild assertions without any evidence, and he also champions data that are obviously false. He subjects himself to a series of humiliation rituals that castrate his character. Once the absurdist has established himself as cognitive dissonance incarnate, his persona discredits everything he touches, and anything he utters can be summarily dismissed as the ramblings of a madman.