News Focus
News Focus
Followers 41
Posts 22099
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: joev2 post# 41442

Wednesday, 08/14/2024 11:34:33 AM

Wednesday, August 14, 2024 11:34:33 AM

Post# of 42661

We believe our product revenue will increase as we secure opportunities to manufacture third party products with silicon nitride, launch and generate revenue from our ceramic armor products, and as we continue to introduce new products into the market.


Ceramic armor part is likely outdated as they made the decision to writedown armor division Monday. That aside, they expect revenue to continue to grow as they continue to introduce new products to market. Cant introduce new products without R&D or buying another companies IP.

=======================================

Joe, you claim youre not a fan of Anson but you're posts continue to aid their efforts to distort and short.

The only thing Sint has been successful at is maintaining salaries and a bonus for the elite


Thats deceptive. Yes they maintain salaries for management. People should get paid for their work and not work for free, otherwise its slave labor. But you added "bonuses for the elite" which is something done to invoke an emotional response in the reader so one can better con them.
The part thats truly deceptive is your statement that theyve only been successful at maintain sales/bonuses when you KNOW this is not true. Theyve had alot of success in R&D. That leads me to your quote about funding operations.

Yep, they have financed operations principally through raising funds, the bulk of which came before the company went public. This is very typical of companies in the R&D stage. As in they are still developing their core IP and have not commercialized the bulk of its IP to date. Those constantly bashing SINT will not give credit to the companies massive expansion of use cases for the company core IP. When Sintx IPOd, it was only a company that could sell ortho implants as part of a 64billion market. Now, its a company with a wide range of product candidates that could sell into markets worth hundreds of billions in aggregate. This company is worth at least $230m just for its tax write off to another company. Not even including how valuable the IP could be. More on that below.

========================================

According to this lawsuit, Anson and its related funds go after companies with valuable assets... This explains why SINT is so undervalued as its been after Sintx IP for going on a decade. The following post goes into how much the company should be valued, methods used to protect IP, and sheer product addressable market size of over $320 billion.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174725108

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News