I understand how you can come to the conclusions you're suggesting. For my part, I am quite sure that what Nem says happened to him (the diagnosis, the surgery, the suggestion at some point of the trial), happened. So rather then flat out accuse him of lying, being a short, and all the other numerous things people have called him here, I'd rather take the sympathetic side, for the most part, because to some degree, I feel he is deserving of it. Additionally, no one else has offered any sympathies towards him... making us all look, well, not so great, and rather unkind IMO. And I think in most of our hearts of hearts, you would be somewhat more sympathetic to what happened to him, if you believed him. Of course, I don't think Northwest played any part in this whatsoever, and of course, all of us know that the patients who were enrolled in the trial legitimately had GBM, and it's rather insulting to their memories to suggest otherwise.
Believe me, I understand why others might think he's lying about all of this, and creating some sort of nefarious persona, as we've seen others do, much like Pyhrr did, on multiple occasions. But I don't believe he is, so there's that.
As far as our discussions driving down the price... perhaps, but I doubt it. I don't think the shorts think Nem's thinking that the whole trial is a sham and that people without GBM and without tumors were entered into the trial to receive a vaccine that simply couldn't even be made. My concerns, frankly, were that Nem was implying that his complaints had moved past NICE and MHRA, whom I personally think have probably listened, looked into, and disagreed with his concerns. And if moving past those concerns is moving on to Paul Mulholland at the CHM, who has indicated his hope for the future of GBM treatment with DCVax-L, then my concerns are alleviated. And accusing Dr. Mulholland of some sort of malfeasance in taking trips on NWBO's dime for the presentation, he's not doing himself any favors to that end.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
