InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 3225
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2021

Re: exwannabe post# 705957

Sunday, 07/14/2024 12:49:12 PM

Sunday, July 14, 2024 12:49:12 PM

Post# of 719147

I will assume this is simply ignorance and not baseless pumping,.

Then you should have made more clear in your previous post what you meant (ECA and not DCVAX patient's data). I can't help it if you are just throwing spaghetti around to see what sticks.

The patient level data in question is from the ECA.. NWBO does not posses it, so cannot provide. There is a reason why the FDA and others state this level of data is needed. And this submission does not have. And even the JAMA paper notes it, are they lying?

ofcourse NWBO does not possess ECA data. But again what is your problem? The inclusion and exclusion criteria that were maintained to admit patients to the DCVAXL treatment arm were always spread out to echo the same as nGBM patients in general and FDA-approved. Therefore one can easily scientifically assume that the DCVAXL data can be compared to ECA data because the ECA data not surprisingly echoes the same as general nGBM patient data. This is confirmed with rGBM compared data.

Moreover, Mr ignorant Basher, if NWBO ignored the FDA mandate to (for logical ethical reasons) have the placebo GBM patients NOT randomize to the treatment arm and thus die to be able to compare this data with the treatment arm then that would have made no difference with ECA comparing. You see my ignorant basher friend every person is different. To imply that the medical trial could have only been conducted by comparing a placebo group with a treatment group is BS not even considering the ethical problems this presents. A placebo group (with SOC treatment of course) is by definition a different set of people besides age and gender than a treatment arm simply because as I just said every person and patient is different. Therefore comparing DCVAXL-treated patients with ECA is the same as comparing it if they had compared it with a placebo group if not much better.

Crickets

Are you saying the video posted here was a fake?

Provide me a link to a video where LL implies that she expects DCVAXL not to be approved but she then has confidence that it will continue as RTT.
SHOW ME THAT VIDEO NOW. Yes Im saying alomst everything you say is fake
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News