Saturday, July 13, 2024 12:10:29 PM
MarkoMD, Thanks for your reply. I am not a doctor, so if my logic is wrong, any feedback would be appreciated.
My assumption is:
- today's cancer drugs are typically limited to treating malignant tumors
- most patients with benign tumors are treated with surgery, radiation, and or monitoring (wait and see)
- the reason is, drugs with risk for high toxicity have restrictive labeling for use only in malignant tumors
- much easier for a doctor to off-label a non-toxic vaccine than a toxic drug
- if the patient with a benign tumor is doing surgery to remove it anyway, why not use DCVax-L
- given DCVax-L is non-toxic, generates an immune response, and leaves behind immune memory, there is no downside
- DCVax would be prophylactic
My conclusions:
- Patients would ask for and doctors would strongly consider providing DCVax to patients with benign cancer
- DCVax penetrates the benign tumor therapy market where other cancer drugs have not been able to.
My assumption is:
- today's cancer drugs are typically limited to treating malignant tumors
- most patients with benign tumors are treated with surgery, radiation, and or monitoring (wait and see)
- the reason is, drugs with risk for high toxicity have restrictive labeling for use only in malignant tumors
- much easier for a doctor to off-label a non-toxic vaccine than a toxic drug
- if the patient with a benign tumor is doing surgery to remove it anyway, why not use DCVax-L
- given DCVax-L is non-toxic, generates an immune response, and leaves behind immune memory, there is no downside
- DCVax would be prophylactic
My conclusions:
- Patients would ask for and doctors would strongly consider providing DCVax to patients with benign cancer
- DCVax penetrates the benign tumor therapy market where other cancer drugs have not been able to.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
