| Followers | 54 |
| Posts | 17531 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Monday, July 08, 2024 1:09:08 PM
YOU were the one asking for information regarding DBMM's top three "clients". As I intimated, if you'd done ANY research on how DBMM operates, you'd have known that DBMM hides behind non-disclosure agreements. It's worth noting that NO other large and successful Digital Marketing companies resort to this subterfuge. Check out some of my past posts and you'll be able to see a listing of those larger companies and how they FREELY give out the names of their clients.
I am not short in this or any other security. As such, I am frightened of nothing.
I see now you have abandoned your rather silly questions and inane assumptions, and gone on to directly attacking posters.
How typical of a DBMM pump artist. You are now starting a rumor regarding a "buyout" attempt by three of DBMM's "clients"??? With NO corroborating evidence?? No PR's, nothing said about such a buyout in any "update"???
Sounds like the typical DBMM rumor that has absolutely no basis in FACT! Not very original!!
You claim there is a large "naked short" position in DBMM, yet you are unable to provide verifiable information that PROVES it. When asked to provide any verifiable proof, you ignore the request and attack those asking for it.
Sounds just like the rantings of just another desperate DBMM long.
I am not short in this or any other security. As such, I am frightened of nothing.
I see now you have abandoned your rather silly questions and inane assumptions, and gone on to directly attacking posters.
How typical of a DBMM pump artist. You are now starting a rumor regarding a "buyout" attempt by three of DBMM's "clients"??? With NO corroborating evidence?? No PR's, nothing said about such a buyout in any "update"???
Sounds like the typical DBMM rumor that has absolutely no basis in FACT! Not very original!!
You claim there is a large "naked short" position in DBMM, yet you are unable to provide verifiable information that PROVES it. When asked to provide any verifiable proof, you ignore the request and attack those asking for it.
Sounds just like the rantings of just another desperate DBMM long.
Bearish
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
