You stated: "First ASC 480-10 was used to establish this liability."
You then after stated the exact opposite, "The company CONSIDERED but did not USE 480 for the determination."
You, in post reply to yourself yet as if to me (showing young boy maturity), exactly countered your own argument.
And then... you stick to both your countering claims.
You are very strange.
Seemingly, more important to you is for you to express your hate, to correct me after I made clear specific argument to rebut your grander claim that I show is your error.
Seems, you can't think straight with all the hate you have, that when you're challenged confuses you about your own story. Most important to you that you kick back your hate, where you throw your story and the facts right out the window, and make up new claims.
Market Data 
Markets 
