News Focus
News Focus
Followers 66
Posts 12701
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/17/2006

Re: scorpio70 post# 250596

Tuesday, 02/27/2007 8:34:38 PM

Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:34:38 PM

Post# of 311080
Scorpio, I am trying to follow your thought process here so help me out a little. I copied your statements and offer some of my own below them. What do you think of what I said or your reasons as to them?


His first goal was to get a retraction from the paper. Failing that his next goal was to seek guidance on sueing the b'jeesus outta the libelous characterization from Mr. Rennie.

So you think that Gary R. from the Star sent the piece to Petar BEFORE it hit the streets? That does not generally happen though does it?

He also knew that in his capacity as CEO that putting out numbers which while powerful were still nothing more than just their word against teams of professionals who would have ripped them to shreds, as they still weren't ready to file with the SEC.

So with all the time that they had them "in hand" they did not figure out till after the deadline that they could not be released? Why did Petar not advise of the issue all along then?

He's already stated that in house numbers were accurate. Pro forma numbers stated revenues incorrectly as they only should have included commission on contracts brokered.

If the in-house numbers were accurate, then who came up with the inaccurate pro-formas? Pro-formas are predicated with in-house accounting figures you know.

Wanna go over their in house numbers that they stand behind?

What numbers are those? I think that's all anyone has been interested in.

Everyone has an opinion, this is mine. Refute it, agree with it, or whatever...

Lurkers have homes:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=8733

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y