| Followers | 202 |
| Posts | 25627 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 04/03/2010 |
Wednesday, May 22, 2024 12:04:01 PM
No, it was a safety IA, but more importantly and more critical, the results and changes were made by an external, completely blinded, expert team of epidemiologists abd statisticians who created the new protocol and ECA. There was a very meticulous effort to exclude any bias. It was clearly, very painstakingly done and took considerable time.
Moreover, that court case you hate said two important things, that up to the time you always claimed there had already been such an IA, there had not been, it was for safety. Up to that point. Further, and MORE importantly, such an IA would not unblind.
https://casetext.com/case/lerner-v-nw-biotherapeutics
“It first bears noting that Plaintiffs cite to a December 13, 2013 press release which explicitly states, "The Company does not participate in the interim analysis process or the assessment, and both the Company and the clinical trial sites remain completely blinded." ECF No. 26–6 at 5. Thus, it is unclear from the Complaint how Plaintiffs attribute the alleged shortcomings of the safety board review to Defendants given their stated lack of involvement.”
All one has to do is to thoroughly read that case to see how absolutely nuts, bat s/it crazy shorts were to make all manner of false and misleading assertions that had zero basis in fact but they had just enough to IMPLY bad faith. Heck, filing the lawsuit and waiting for it to resolve allowed them to go on for YEARS implying false and misleading and nasty things about the company, management and DCVax-L as well as about Dr. Liau, and get away with it.
Shorts are, and if it is not obvious to observers, it should be by now, filled with crazy hot air because as success becomes more and more apparent, they realize that they literally have nothing BUT hot air and implied allegations without basis in substantial truth. Implied allegations always rely on some nut of fact, not necessarily proving the claim, but something upon which they can IMPLY something nasty or unpleasant.
But time and time again. Shorts are wrong.
https://wapo.st/3Ke1J1g
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/article/fda-approval-brain-cancer-alzheimers
Moreover, that court case you hate said two important things, that up to the time you always claimed there had already been such an IA, there had not been, it was for safety. Up to that point. Further, and MORE importantly, such an IA would not unblind.
https://casetext.com/case/lerner-v-nw-biotherapeutics
“It first bears noting that Plaintiffs cite to a December 13, 2013 press release which explicitly states, "The Company does not participate in the interim analysis process or the assessment, and both the Company and the clinical trial sites remain completely blinded." ECF No. 26–6 at 5. Thus, it is unclear from the Complaint how Plaintiffs attribute the alleged shortcomings of the safety board review to Defendants given their stated lack of involvement.”
All one has to do is to thoroughly read that case to see how absolutely nuts, bat s/it crazy shorts were to make all manner of false and misleading assertions that had zero basis in fact but they had just enough to IMPLY bad faith. Heck, filing the lawsuit and waiting for it to resolve allowed them to go on for YEARS implying false and misleading and nasty things about the company, management and DCVax-L as well as about Dr. Liau, and get away with it.
Shorts are, and if it is not obvious to observers, it should be by now, filled with crazy hot air because as success becomes more and more apparent, they realize that they literally have nothing BUT hot air and implied allegations without basis in substantial truth. Implied allegations always rely on some nut of fact, not necessarily proving the claim, but something upon which they can IMPLY something nasty or unpleasant.
But time and time again. Shorts are wrong.
https://wapo.st/3Ke1J1g
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/article/fda-approval-brain-cancer-alzheimers
I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.
Recent NWBO News
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 05/11/2026 01:00:00 PM
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/11/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:38:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
