Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFTD)

[I-Glow]

You still don't get - no matter who wins it doesn't change anything - Sharp still doesn't have a company lined up for a reverse merger.

Sharp has duped the novice investors - and it seems have never functioned in the business world.

Being a successful CEO - means that everyday you are putting out fires. Sharp is too immature to be a successful CEO - Plus Sharp has never operated a successful business.

This is more proof you don't understand the legal system.



"A pile of cases are presented to you. You don't start with the oldest but rather the most recent case and work backwards. Why? Judges know that if a case has been sitting around too long, something is amiss. Usually that means that a predecessor deliberately avoided ruling on the case for one reason or another."

As the cases come in - In Nevada, the chief justice or a screening panel determines the decisional track for cases retained by the supreme court. If the assigned panel determines that a case has been improperly screened, the presiding justice can reassign the case to a different decisional track.

The sure as hell don't say - that sounds too hard let's put it at the bottom.

Sharp didn't want the case to proceed because it would mean that Big Talk. Sharp would have to produce a company for a merger.

I hope you aren't serious with this BS:

"The case with Callesse clearly is one that the previous judges felt should be settled out of court. I believe that a decision by the judges would have set a dangerous precedent that they preferred not to author."

That isn't how the NVSC works - they have to provide a legal decision and not just some previous Judge felt like it should be settled out of court. If that was true the NVSC would still be required to provide a Decision - and it wouldn't include - I felt like it should be settled out side of court.

Why don't you provide case law to support this nonsense.

IG